Testimony
Educating our Children with Technology Skills To Compete in the Next Millennium.
Graham Spanier
March 24, 1998
Thank you for this opportunity to speak today from higher education's
perspective on technology education. As president of Penn State, chair
of the Commission on Information Technologies of the National
Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges, and a
founding board member of the University Consortium for Advanced
Internet Development, I will say that this area is one of the highest
priorities for universities and colleges nationwide. As advancements in
information science and technology continue to revolutionize so many
aspects of our society, the scientific, technological, and sociological
dimensions of accessing, storing, retrieving, communicating, and using
information are key concerns for universities such as Penn State. They
are vital to our role in promoting economic and human development and
integral to our educational mission.
Higher learning's efforts to promote technology education do not
occur in an isolated context, but move forward with many of the same
developments in infrastructure, capabilities, and policy that enable
the integration of information technology at the elementary and
secondary school levels. Cooperative efforts such as Pennsylvania's
Link-to-Learn initiative, which seeks to provide unlimited access to
the global information network for all the schools, libraries, and
communities of the state, are essential to developing a technology-able
citizenry. My university is leading the professional development
component of Link-to-Learn; others are taking the lead in different
areas. It is in working together across all levels of education and in
partnership with government and business that we all will be able to
meet the many complex challenges that these rapidly advancing
technologies present. At the university level, our
educational challenge relates both to vastly increasing the number of
graduates in information science and technology fields and to
transforming the technology skills and awareness of all students to
better meet marketplace needs. We also can contribute to the continuing
education that is inherent to such a quickly evolving field. Without
a doubt, there's a need to graduate more individuals in the technical
fields of computer science and engineering. It is estimated that more
than one million new computer scientists and engineers will be needed
within a matter of years, yet we know that the number of computer and
information science baccalaureate degrees is dramatically down compared
to 10 years ago, to about 25,000 per year. We also know that only about
2 percent of students earning bachelor's degrees earn them in computer
science. The effort to build the skills and interests needed for these
fields must begin in the elementary and secondary school years,
particularly as they relate to mathematics and engineering. But
based on my observations at Penn State, I believe the tide may already
be turning. Demand for our computer science program greatly exceeds its
present capacity. We are now seeing the first generation of graduates
who have grown up with personal computers. These young people demand
access to them on campus for solving problems and completing projects
in their courses, and they know that digital technologies are important
tools in virtually every field of work. Many are savvy enough to see
the excellent job opportunities awaiting graduates with high level
information technology skills. What we must do is
capitalize on these interests and do so in such a way as to meet the
full array of needs for information science and technology workers.
There's a need for a spectrum of skills and sophistication ranging from
two-year degrees to PhDs. There is also a need for students in nearly
every major to develop significant competency in information science
and technology applications. Institutions of higher education must
balance specific information technology skills development with
long-term competencies in communications, management, and other
disciplines. I believe we will accomplish this best through greater
integration of information science and technology studies and
discipline-based programs, and by partnering with industry to
understand quickly and clearly marketplace needs, provide practical
experiences for students, and gain access to the latest breaking
technologies for the academic community. Among the
options we are pursuing at Penn State is the creation of a new School
of Information Science and Technology. While we have not fully
articulated the vision for this new approach, my hope is that we would
provide a strong core curriculum for students with minors in other
fields, or alternatively a minor for students with majors in other
fields. The school would promote interdisciplinary approaches not only
in teaching, but in research and service as well. Looking
more broadly at the integration of information technology throughout
the curriculum, advanced digital technologies are revolutionizing the
process of teaching and learning in every field. As they do so, all
students gain valuable experience in using these tools on a daily basis. For
example, instruction is becoming far more interactive. E-mail and other
networking modes increase interaction between students and teachers and
among students, changing the traditional one-way flow of communication
from the professor that has been so much a staple of instruction in the
past. The most recent report by the Campus Computing Project indicates
that e-mail is now being used in 33 percent of college courses, up from
about 25 percent last year, and from 8 percent in 1994 when this
measure was first collected. At Penn State, more than 90 percent of our
students have activated their access accounts giving them e-mail
service and entry on to the Web. In our College of Engineering, 100
percent of the students are on-line. Further changes in
teaching and learning are being wrought by the enormous availability of
resources through the net that may be directly accessed by learners.
Data, sound, visualizations, and now even tactile information engage
students throughout the university more actively in learning. These
changes have profound implications for the structure of courses and
programs, for staffing to support both faculty and student technology
users, for our library collections and services, and, of course, for
the availability of interactive technologies. For students, this new
model of instruction fosters important lifelong learning skills. For
the extended learning community we serve, it offers an unprecedented
level of flexibility and quality in learning. Another
change concerns the incredible growth in demand for information
technology services, and the increased dependence that a university
such as Penn State has on a fully functioning infrastructure. There are
more than 38,000 computers directly attached to Penn State's network,
and tens of thousands of computers in faculty, staff, and student
residences off campus that are connected indirectly via dial ups. Penn
State transmits in excess of 1.7 million e-mail messages per day. Our
central Web servers are accessed more than 500,000 times each day from
all over the world. Almost 15,000 students have created Web pages that
are accessed some 260,000 times per day. Our faculty routinely transmit
billions of characters of data in their research to and from other
centers around the nation and the world. We have just launched a Penn
State World Campus--a virtual university whose programs and courses
will be offered via the Internet and other distance education
technologies. If universities are to capitalize on
technology to promote active learning and support our tremendous and
still growing telecommunications needs, there are several challenges
that must be met. We must keep up with the continuing
advancements in telecommunications technologies. It may not be possible
to predict what technologies will predominate in five years, but it is
certain that they will require a significant institutional investment.
This must be an area of special priority. On the horizon are
developments such as synthetic environments that use multimedia to
create artificial realities. Portability will become increasingly
critical. We will hear voice carried over the Internet routinely. High
speed networking will accelerate substantially compared to today's
standards. The university without such capabilities will be left far
behind. Our institutions also must keep up with user
demand for connectivity and do so at a sufficient capacity to support
the desired applications. The necessary infrastructure must be in
place--cabling, satellite, technology classrooms, computer labs, and
support staff--to meet the needs of those on campus and extend services
to the communities we support. This is a continuing need as equipment
ages, demand grows, and new applications emerge. Increasing bandwidth,
for example, has become a significant need to accommodate high speed
networks and multimedia applications. There never seem to be enough
computers in our student labs on campus. Despite the large number of
students at Penn State who own their own computer -- in excess of 60
percent at the University Park Campus -- they use the labs for
specialized and expensive software and higher computer power than they
own. They also look to the labs for high performance networking that
connects to academic services at Penn State and elsewhere. Our students
line up, often waiting 30 minutes or more at a lab even though the
majority have access to another machine. Last fall semester, there were
almost 1.3 million sessions in our core computer labs at University
Park. The growth of Web-based instruction will vastly
increase the number of hours of connectivity required for courses. This
has tremendous implications for infrastructure as well as training for
faculty. Another area of challenge relates to policies
that are supportive of the increased flexibility and access made
possible through technology. Many of these issues impact students
directly, concerning such areas as financial aid and transferability of
credits for distance education. Others relate to the flow of
information itself, centering on intellectual property issues. Still
others concern the regulation of the telecommunications industry and
promoting the best interests of educational institutions in this arena. Last
fall, the Higher Education Alliance for Information Technology, a
coalition of the major higher education associations that represent
nearly 3,000 colleges and universities, released the document Higher Education Policies for the Digital Age to convey our united position on many of these issues. This document is available at the Website http://www.nasulgc.nche.edu/DigitalAge_TOC.htm. An
overarching principle for higher education's position on these matters
is that the commitment to unfettered free inquiry, critical
examination, and free dissemination of information and ideas transcends
changes in technology and organization. We therefore believe that
intellectual property rights and the interests of users must be
balanced to promote creation and dissemination of ideas. Particularly
with the growth of the Web, copyright infringement liability is of
concern. For our institutions, in their role as on-line service
providers, it is essential to define the limits of third-party
liability. In keeping with our commitment to free speech
and inquiry, we espouse the view that these concerns should take
precedence over narrower concerns such as protection from exposure to
offensive material, particularly when such protection can be achieved
by means other than legislation. We also want to see
any regulation of telecommunications carefully targeted to sustain
competitive market forces that enhance access by promoting efficiency
and lower costs. In the case of Internet regulation, for example,
substantial freedom has contributed to the successful commercialization
of the Internet and to major investments in advanced networking
facilities by the telecommunications industry. The higher
education community also advocates policies that promote access by the
widest possible public to the benefits of our digital age. We want to
encourage seamless access to educational opportunities at all levels as
well as investment in advanced network technologies for the workplace,
home, and all levels of educational institutions. Finally,
we believe that higher education will serve the public best if reliable
and efficient communications networks are ubiquitous. We urge that
public investment in network infrastructure and basic research be
combined with freedom for competitive market forces to promote
efficiency and lower costs. Key initiatives here include a continuation
of a government/university/industry partnership in support of advanced
Internet development. We wish also to promote policy that supports the
transfer of newly developed Internet technology to all segments of the
education community. And we are concerned that open standards and
protocols be developed to facilitate the transition to more advanced
generations of the Internet. We have reached a point with
the current Internet where it is no longer able to reliably handle the
expanding information and communications needs of our universities.
Internet 2 is a project of the University Consortium for Advanced
Internet Development, an organization of more than 100 research
universities across the nation. It is rapidly moving forward to develop
a network that is substantially faster than the one we have today and
able to handle highly complex applications essential to the teaching,
research, and service missions of our institutions. Another major goal
of this project is to transfer rapidly new network services and
applications to all levels of educational use and to the broader
Internet community. Advanced Internet technologies will give all of us
the capability to extend the learning environment into homes and
businesses. Internet 2 is a separate, but highly
compatible effort to the federal Next Generation Internet project. I
urge your support for H.R. 3332 that will provide authorization for the
Next Generation Internet initiative. The development of advanced
network technologies will be dependent on a continued partnership of
government, universities, and industry. In summary,
technology education in our universities will proceed best in a
technology-rich environment that capitalizes on the latest applications
and tools in all areas of teaching and learning and provides widespread
access to the vast information resources available today. This
environment is essential to support special initiatives to meet
information technology workforce needs as well as to promote the
technology skills of all students. As we expand infrastructure, advance
networking capabilities, and pursue policy initiatives that enable the
integration of information technologies into every aspect of our work,
we also are making contributions that are vital to reaping the many
economic and educational benefits of these powerful tools throughout
our society.
|