Speeches
Partnering in a Global World
Graham B. Spanier
January 23, 2001
I am truly honored to be here today with such forward-thinking
individuals who are attempting to look beyond the walls of their own
institutions for solutions to educating the next generation of students
as they face a world of growing globalization.
Throughout the 1990s, we all heard the buzz about "thinking globally" and the importance of our "new global economy."
I know some of you who hear these words now might be taking this as
your cue for a quick nap, since the topic of globalization has
dominated so much of the news over the last few years. But please bear
with me. The truth is that the idea of "going global" is no longer a
novelty -- it is an essential requirement in the survival of nearly all
enterprises in the new millennium.
Higher education is no exception. In fact, education in this era of
globalization has been touted as the key to the growth in democracy,
economic prosperity and economic stability. Leaders of nearly every
nation have recognized the significant and lasting role education can
have on a country and its economic vitality and how it can make a
powerful difference in the lives of citizens. In fact, in the United
States, education is one of the leading growth sectors when it comes to
international trade. In the U.S., higher education is the fifth
largest exporter of services.
Yet such economic-related concerns are but one of the forces in the
global society. Broader societal change, including the domains of
politics, culture, environment, and health also crosses borders each
and every day. The need for international and multicultural
understanding and cooperation has never been greater.
The need to graduate individuals who have a more expansive
understanding of the world and its many facets has been expressed
repeatedly by the growing numbers of companies that are multinational
in scope. The increasing scarcity of resources and the decline in
governmental support in some countries for research and scholarly
activity that is essential to the prosperity of our nations point to a
need for a more cooperative approach that will lessen the burden on
individual institutions.
If higher education ignores the global perspectives that are
influencing so much of life today, we as leaders of these institutions
certainly fall short in our responsibilities to prepare our students
for an international environment and to find solutions to some of the
most pressing problems facing the world today.
There is no question that at the heart of this global revolution --
which is actually still in its infancy -- is the explosive growth in
technology. From video conferencing to broadband access to desktops to
virtual reality, emerging technologies continue to promise
opportunities for expanding institutional cooperation both domestically
and internationally.
The speed with which information technology has penetrated higher
education has left us little time to understand fully its impact or to
anticipate new developments. But what we do understand is that new
information technologies are making it easier to reach more students,
conduct research and explore new partnerships that can effortlessly
cross continents.
For example, the highly interactive nature of recent developments in
telecommunications technology are opening up unprecedented
opportunities for distance education around the world. In the United
States, the number of distance education programs increased 72 percent
between 1995 and 1998. These interactive technologies, and the
tremendous capacity of our networks also to serve as databases,
libraries, and other information resources, are highly supportive of
international collaboration in research and scholarship as well.
In this global environment, there can be no doubt that institutions of
higher education around the world must forge links with partner
institutions and scholars abroad to fulfill our education, research,
and public service missions. In the words of the late United States
Senator J. William Fulbright, who sponsored the international student
exchange program that bears his name, "We must try, through education,
to realize something new in the world -- by persuasion rather than by
force, cooperatively rather than competitively, not for the purpose of
gaining dominance for a nation or an ideology but for the purpose of
helping every society develop its own concept of public decency and
individual fulfillment."
I am happy to say that a growing number of partnerships among U.S.
institutions and institutions in the United Kingdom have dotted the
collaborative landscape in recent years, including many between my own
institution and a number of those that are represented here today. Our
British Science Exchange program with the universities of Glasgow in
Scotland, Wales in Aberystwyth, Lancaster, Sussex, Leeds, Essex and
Bath allows students to complete courses abroad that will count toward
the completion of their degree. Our students also participate in a
kinesiology program at Eastbourne University of Brighton; a
communications and an economics program at the University of
Manchester; and programs in environmental studies, computer science and
business at the University College Northhampton.
In addition, Penn State has had an exchange arrangement since 1977 with
the University of Leeds that exposes undergraduates in architectural
engineering to a different context and cultural perspective for the
study of buildings and architecture.
There are many other such cooperative efforts between Penn State and
institutions here. In fact, every year hundreds of Penn State students
spend time at institutions in the United Kingdom as part of our study
abroad programs. And every year, your students travel to Penn State to
enrich their learning experience by immersing themselves in a different
culture and a different way of learning, to gain a broader view of the
world.
Currently, there are 70 students from Britain enrolled at Penn State.
Overall, Penn State is home to more than 3,600 international students
and is ranked among the top 20 institutions in the United States in
providing a home for international students.
We expect to continue to increase this number over the next few
years. In the United States, nearly 515,000 international
students are currently studying at American colleges and universities
-- an increase of 4.8 percent over last year's total. However, this
number still accounts for only about 4 percent of U.S. college
enrollment. Worldwide there are about 1.5 million international
students -- only about 130,000 of these students are from the United
States. Clearly, as a nation, the U.S. must do a better job of
providing opportunities for international linkages.
Effective education is no longer limited to our campuses. It is
certainly no longer limited to the borders of our countries. I know
most of us are eager to move toward a new cooperative paradigm;
otherwise we would not be here.
In order to open wider our doors for international cooperation, there
are several things we must do as institutions of higher education to
facilitate this progress and break the limitations of our national
thinking. The first is to better prepare our undergraduates with an
international perspective. At Penn State, we have given priority to
internationalizing the university and have taken a number of steps to
move international studies and programs to the center of our teaching,
research and outreach activities.
One measure we have taken is to require incoming undergraduate students
to have some foreign language proficiency before they enter the
University. This will better enable them to take advantage of
international education opportunities once they are here. In some of
our colleges, such as Liberal Arts, Business Administration, and
Information Sciences and Technology, the requirement for a proficiency
in a foreign language is even more stringent, requiring
university-level proficiency . Although English is the predominant
language of academe, the United States has fallen behind in teaching
our students the importance of learning an additional language.
Many of our undergraduate majors have an international component For
example, all of the programs in our College of Business have an
international option that requires study abroad. Our new general
education curriculum - those university-wide courses students take
regardless of their major -- has been redesigned to include a strong
international component.
At Penn State, we believe that the internationalization of the
University begins with faculty. Collaborative research across
international borders and professional travel opportunities abroad
enable our professors to incorporate important global perspectives in
the curricula. More than 1,400 courses at Penn State have at least
one-quarter of their content with an international thrust.
Another area that I have already touched upon, but that requires our
attention in order to foster a cooperative international environment,
is technology. Needless to say, we couldn't ignore this one, even if we
wanted to.
We have already seen the transformation that global technology has had
on the world, but there are still many nations and many institutions of
higher education that cannot fully participate in the promise that
these emerging technologies hold.
Further standardization of the protocols or common procedures used to
communicate with one another, process information and perform
high-level functions across networks would be helpful. In this way,
access to the global information system will be more universal.
In fact, this is one of the goals of Internet 2, corporately known as
the University Consortium for Advanced Internet Development. The rapid
growth of the Internet, and more importantly the promise of the
Internet for scholarly exchange and collaborative research at the
highest levels, has created opportunities that will require more
clearly articulated international cooperation.
Penn State was a founding member of Internet2, a next-generation
network that is substantially faster than the current Internet. More
than 180 universities and about 70 companies are participating in
Internet2, developing new applications in areas such as medicine,
computer science and communications.
A major goal of Interent2 is to transfer new network services and
applications rapidly to all levels of educational use and to the
broader Internet community, both nationally and internationally. One
example of an extraordinary new application that has been developed and
is currently being used by Penn State and other institutions is
ImmersaDesk, a virtual reality technology that allows users to interact
with their research environment. This application, which can allow
real-time data sharing, has already been used for climatological data
visualization, architectural design, and molecular modeling, and it
holds promise for research into interactive data mining, virtual
surgery, and many other areas of data simulation and modeling.
Here in Europe, you are also building a high-speed research network
known as GEANT, that will connect research institutions in 30
countries. Similar to Internet2, the European network is expected to
serve as a testing ground for new applications in fields such as
medicine and telecommunications.
This type of collaboration is what is needed to
ensure that researchers and scholars have access to important new
technologies and advances in science.
There are, of course, not inconsequential costs
associated with these cooperative efforts. This brings me to my third
point: We must strongly encourage our governments to make a greater
commitment to the use of taxpayer dollars for funding cooperative
ventures outside our borders.
Some headway was made in this area recently when the U.S. Department of
Energy agreed to provide $531 million toward the construction of a $6
billion particle accelerator near the French-Swiss border. It is the
first time the U.S. agreed to fund the construction of such a facility
outside the United States. More than 4,000 scientists from 35 countries
are helping to build this megascale research project.
Another example that involves my own institution is the Hobby-Eberly
telescope, a major facility located in a remote area of Texas that
involves our faculty in astronomy and astrophysics in collaboration
with colleagues in the U.S. and Germany. An interesting new
development is the construction of a parallel telescope in South Africa
that involves additional partners and will allow the second telescope
to cover the southern hemisphere as the Hobby-Eberly telescope covers
the northern hemisphere.
Although other collaborations would not require such large investments,
governments have historically been reluctant to provide support for
international projects or facilities that would find their home in
another nation -- in part because of the potential backlash from
taxpayers. There is also concern about which country's industries will
benefit most economically and technologically from these international
ventures. Educating the general public about the critical need for
international cooperation in this era of globalization is an important
component that higher education must not overlook.
In addition, institutions of higher education must lobby for increased
support from national and international foundations and governments for
the funding of think tanks - the Salzburg Seminar is an excellent
example -- that can promote global dialogue on issues of pressing
international educational concern. These centers of expertise can bring
together individuals from different countries to find solutions to
shared worldwide problems.
The final area that institutions of higher education must address as
they collaborate internationally is the need to involve less-developed
countries in their plans. Many countries, particularly in this
post-Cold War era, have much to contribute in the way of scholarship
and research, but have little in the way of financial resources.
This fact was dramatically illustrated for me during a recent trip to
Moscow where I was part of a team evaluating and consulting with a
Russian university. The economic transition of the Soviet Union to a
market economy has resulted in a real scarcity of funds that is having
a profound impact on higher education and scientific research.
When paying distinguished faculty a salary commensurate with what an
entry-level worker makes in the private sector is considered
impossible, there is little chance that governmental support for
collaboration can be provided in an equitable fashion. Even though many
nations don't have the financial resources to reach out
internationally, they often have great expertise, a strong commitment
to the advancement of science and technology, and much to contribute to
the cultural diversity that can be brought to a study.
Focusing for a moment longer on Russia, I want to mention that The
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace recently issued a report on
the state of U.S.-Russian relations in which it stated that supporting
higher education and research in the former Soviet Union is "democracy
assistance in its most elemental form, since it is impossible to
imagine a vibrant democracy and a healthy civil society in a nation
where higher education and research are starved of resources or
disfigured by ideologies appropriately consigned to the 'dustbin of
history.'"
Spin the globe and you will find many countries in comparable
predicaments. Finding ways to engage these countries in multinational
educational and scholarly endeavors will dramatically increase their
economic, social and cultural wealth -- for as we know, an educated
populace is the key to the survival of any nation.
At the same time, our countries and our institutions also benefit by
building stronger ties to other members of our worldwide community.
Partnering on an international scale, whether through distance
education, study abroad programs, faculty exchanges, membership in a
consortium or a larger research endeavor, is a requisite for the future.
The sooner we join forces with other institutions across the globe, the
sooner we can begin meeting the ever-changing needs of our dynamic
world.
|